A federal judge has now granted a temporary injunction to Joe Biden’s federal vaccine mandate for the Navy SEALs based on religious freedom.
The First Liberty Institute had filed a lawsuit on behalf of 35 Navy SEALs back in November. This lawsuit was demanding a religious exemption from the Biden Administration’s Department of Defense vaccine mandate.
In this decision on Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’ Connor ruled in favor of the SEALs, writing
“Our nation asks the men and women in our military to serve, suffer, and sacrifice. But we do not ask them to lay aside their citizenry and give up the very rights they have sworn to protect,”
“The mandate treats comparable secular activity (e.g., medical exemptions) more favorably than religious activity. First, the Navy has granted only secular exemptions—it has never granted a religious exemption from the vaccine. Second, even if the Navy were to grant a religious exemption, that exemption would still receive less favorable treatment than its secular counterparts. Those who receive religious exemptions are medically disqualified. Those who receive medical exemptions are not. But the activity itself—forgoing the vaccine—is identical. Given the irrationality of the mandate, “[i]t is unsurprising that such litigants are entitled to relief.” He wrote.
“The first fifteen steps require an administrator to update a prepared disapproval template with the requester’s name and rank. In essence, the Plaintiffs’ requests are denied the moment they begin. That prepared letter is then sent to seven offices for review. After those offices review the disapproval letter, the administrator packages the letter with other religious accommodation requests for final signature. The administrator then prepares an internal memo to Vice Admiral John Nowell, asking him to “sign . . . letters disapproving immunization waiver requests based on sincerely held religious beliefs.” He added.
“Then, at step thirty-five of the process, the administrator is told—for the first time—to read through the religious accommodation request. At that point, the disapproval letter has already been written, the religious accommodation request and related documents has already been reviewed by several offices, the disapproval has already been packaged with similar requests, and an internal memo has already been drafted requesting that Vice Admiral Nowell disapprove the religious accommodation request.” He continued.
Judge Connor acknowledged that the Biden Administration failed to show a compelling interest in forcing these service members to violate their “sincerely held religious beliefs” following the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
“Without individualized assessment, the Navy cannot demonstrate a compelling interest in vaccinating these particular Plaintiffs,” the judge argued. “Even if Defendants have a broad compelling interest in widespread vaccination of its force, they have achieved this goal without the participation of the thirty-five Plaintiffs here.” He wrote in his decision
“Several Plaintiffs have tested positive for antibodies, showing the presence of natural immunity. With a 99.4% vaccination rate, the Navy’s herd immunity is at an all-time high,” he continued. “COVID-19 treatments are becoming increasingly effective at reducing hospitalization and death.” He added.
What do you make of this court’s decision to protect the SEALs’ religious freedom? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
What about those of us that seek to by pass the mandate because it violates our constitutional freedom?