DOJ Withdraws Obstruction Charges Against J6 Defenders, Modifies Plea Deals

In its nearly four years in power, the Biden-Harris regime did nothing for justice aside from attacking and weaponizing the law against their opponents to disarm, silence, and suppress dissent.

The corrupt Democrat-led White House did nothing for the people, for free speech, or even for democracy.

The imprisonment of hundreds of January 6 protesters was one of the biggest attacks launched by the Democrap Party against the Republicans.

Hundreds of J6 defenders were mobbed and arrested for obstruction charges filed by the Department of Justice, as ordered by the Deep State and its attack dog, Crazy Nancy Pelosi.

But, in a major decision last June, the Supreme Court decided that the Justice Department has applied and interpreted the statute broadly, penalizing anyone guilty with up to 20 years of imprisonment.

The Fischer v. United States decision pushed the DOJ to withdraw pending obstruction charges of more than 60 of 126 defendants facing similar cases.

The DOJ retains the charges for 13 J6 political prisoners while they weave new bullcr*p charges for the remaining defendants.

Based on the data released by the Justice Department, almost 133 defendants’ charges were adjudicated since the SCOTUS’ opinion was released, and the DOJ “does not oppose dismissal or vacatur of the charge in approximately 40 cases.”

Meanwhile, one J6 defender appealed and had his sentence reduced due to the dismissal of the obstruction charge.

The Democrap’s DOJ asserts that “there are zero cases where a defendant was charged only for violating 18 U.S.C. § 151s.”

“In other words, even if the government foregoes this charge, every charged defendant will continue to face exposure to other criminal charges,” the DOJ claimed.

However, the truth is that 17 defendants were serving prison sentences because of the DOJ’s fabricated ‘obstruction charge.’

According to the SCOTUS, the DOJ should “establish that the defendant impaired the availability or integrity for use in an official proceeding of records, documents, objects” or “other things used in the proceeding” to prove that there is indeed an act of obstruction or a violation committed.

Furthermore, the highest court added, “Department of Justice had taken too broad a view of [18 U.S.C.] 1512(c)(2), a law that prohibits the destruction of evidence but was not intended for protests.”

It also said: “Unless the defendants could be shown to have interfered with the delivery of documents to Congress, they could not be prosecuted under the statute — as hundreds of people, including former President Donald Trump, have been.”