In a decisive performance during the vice presidential debate, J.D. Vance emerged as the clear winner, a sentiment echoed across social media platforms and even by CNN. However, the narrative from MSNBC tells a different story, as they cling to the belief that Tim Walz outperformed Vance.
This denial is not surprising; it seems that the left is simply unable to acknowledge any success for Trump and Vance, regardless of the evidence. One has to wonder if they genuinely believe their own rhetoric.
Rachel Maddow, in her post-debate analysis, stated, “On every issue on substance, JD Vance was very polished and very slick, and Tim Walz beat him on all the substantive points.” This assertion is a clear attempt to downplay Vance’s strong showing.
Here’s Maddow’s post debate comments:
(RUMBLE VIDEO)
Joy Reid, known for her extreme views, added her own take: “JD Vance said nothing memorable. They were all bland lies. He got outdone by Tim Walz. Walz won the debate because he was relatable and had substance. He showed himself to be reasonable and practical.” Such comments only serve to highlight the absurdity of their position.
Here is Joy Reid, who comes off even crazier, naturally:
(RUMBLE VIDEO)
In reality, if Vance’s performance was deemed “unmemorable,” it stands in stark contrast to Walz’s most notable remarks, which included calling himself a “knucklehead” and admitting he “misspoke” about being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre.
The left’s inability to accept the truth is almost comical, and it underscores the farcical nature of MSNBC’s commentary. It’s clear that Vance’s victory is undeniable, regardless of the spin from the left.
MSNBC is such a joke.
