The truth is slowly coming out, and it tastes sweet. While the Democratic party is scrambling to save their plummeting campaign, conservatives, MAGA supporters, truth advocates, and all the victims of the Biden regime are finally attaining the justice they all deserve.
Jonathan Turley, constitutional law professor and legal expert, lauds the decision of the Supreme Court on Friday to invalidate the “obstruction” charges against J6 defendants.
But for Turley, “the biggest impact of the decision may occur elsewhere.”
He added that labeling January 6 as an “insurrection” has served as a way to gauge the biases of certain media outlets, pundits, and government officials.
“Members of Congress such as Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) claimed a conspiracy of “armed and organized insurrectionists.” The claim is legally absurd but politically advantageous,” Turley wrote in his op-ed piece for The Hill.
Video by Nicholas Pagnotta.
Click the button to follow him on Rumble!
However, based on the recent ruling of the SCOTUS, insurrection charges now look more like a “legal case of mass trespass and unlawful entry.”
Turley added that the decision also exposed how the Justice Department “wrongly prosecuted hundreds of people for the obstruction crime.”
The DOJ weaponized the law to restrict individuals who wanted to come and protest.
The legal expert recalled what one Justice Department quipped in a television interview, “our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe…it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they’re, like, ‘If we go there, we’re gonna get charged.’ …We wanted to take out those individuals that essentially were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did.”
The decision of the highest court on the Fischer case will terminate all minority cases that were based entirely on the charge under 1512 (c)(2).
Turley explained that the section exploited by the DOJ to attack demonstrators was based on the 2001 Enron Scandal, designed to allow criminal charges for the destruction of evidence in the form of documents and records.
Biden’s corrupt Justice Department wrongfully interpreted the provision “to broadly include any obstruction of any legal proceeding, and then used it in hundreds of January 6 cases.”
At least a quarter of the prosecutions have this charge, which means that many will have resentencing, and pending cases will continue without the obstruction claim.
The SCOTUS opinion contradicts the long-held propaganda spread by Biden’s media that the J6 was an insurrection. Surveys further revealed that the majority of American people saw the protest escalate into a riot rather than an effort to overthrow the government. This point of view brought by the SCOTUS decision suggests that the legal framework where the J6 defendants were charged was flawed.
“The Fischer v. US marks a turning point in the legal and political discourse surrounding January 6,” Turley remarked in his column.
He concluded: “This ruling underscores the need for accurate legal interpretations and highlights the potential misuse of broad legal provisions in politically charged cases.”
Donald Trump sacrificed a life of luxury to be convicted in a fake trial, with a rigged jury, a communist judge, a communist DA, a communist state AG, a Communist Governor, a communist DOJ, and a dictator living in the White House.
Love the info, on Jan. 6.